Insects

您所在的位置：网站首页 › angular diameter distance › Insects

Insects

#Insects | 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

Next Article in Journal Edge Effects in the Distribution of Coleoptera in the Forests of the Center of the European Part of Russia Previous Article in Journal Molecular Identification of Culicoides Species and Host Preference Blood Meal in the African Horse Sickness Outbreak-Affected Area in Hua Hin District, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province, Thailand Journals Active Journals Find a Journal Proceedings Series Topics Information For Authors For Reviewers For Editors For Librarians For Publishers For Societies For Conference Organizers Open Access Policy Institutional Open Access Program Special Issues Guidelines Editorial Process Research and Publication Ethics Article Processing Charges Awards Testimonials Author Services Initiatives Sciforum MDPI Books Preprints.org Scilit SciProfiles Encyclopedia JAMS Proceedings Series About Overview Contact Careers News Blog Sign In / Sign Up Notice clear Notice

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

Continue Cancel clear

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess.

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Journals Active Journals Find a Journal Proceedings Series Topics Information For Authors For Reviewers For Editors For Librarians For Publishers For Societies For Conference Organizers Open Access Policy Institutional Open Access Program Special Issues Guidelines Editorial Process Research and Publication Ethics Article Processing Charges Awards Testimonials Author Services Initiatives Sciforum MDPI Books Preprints.org Scilit SciProfiles Encyclopedia JAMS Proceedings Series About Overview Contact Careers News Blog Sign In / Sign Up Submit Journals Insects Volume 14 Issue 4 10.3390/insects14040370

Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue ► ▼ Article Menu Article Menu Academic Editor

Brian T. Forschler Subscribe SciFeed Recommended Articles Related Info Link Google Scholar More by Authors Links on DOAJ Tan, C. Cai, X. Luo, Z. Li, Z. Xiu, C. Chen, Z. Bian, L. on Google Scholar Tan, C. Cai, X. Luo, Z. Li, Z. Xiu, C. Chen, Z. Bian, L. on PubMed Tan, C. Cai, X. Luo, Z. Li, Z. Xiu, C. Chen, Z. Bian, L. /ajax/scifeed/subscribe Article Views Citations - Table of Contents Altmetric share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up ... Endorse textsms ... Comment Need Help? Support

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Get Support Feedback

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Give Feedback Information

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

Get Information clear JSmol Viewer clear first_page settings Order Article Reprints Font Type: Arial Georgia Verdana Font Size: Aa Aa Aa Line Spacing:    Column Width:    Background: Open AccessArticle Visual acuity of Empoasca onukii (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae) by

Chang Tan 1,

Xiaoming Cai 1,2,

Zongxiu Luo 1,2,

Zhaoqun Li 1,2,

Chunli Xiu 1,2,

Zongmao Chen 1,2 and

Lei Bian 1,2,* 1 Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, 9 Meiling South Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou 310008, China 2 Key Laboratory of Tea Biology and Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, 9 Meiling South Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou 310008, China * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Insects 2023, 14(4), 370; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040370 Received: 10 March 2023 / Revised: 4 April 2023 / Accepted: 5 April 2023 / Published: 8 April 2023 Download Download PDF Download PDF with Cover Download XML Download Epub Browse Figures Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract: Simple SummaryEmpoasca onukii, a small hemipteran insect, is a serious pest of tea plants. Visual cues play an important role in habitat localization of adult E. onukii. In this study, we found that an acute zone exists in the compound eyes of adult E. onukii. A structural trade-off of the compound eye ensures that E. onukii has low-resolution vision (approximately 0.14 cycles per degree). AbstractEmpoasca onukii is a common tea plant pest with a preference for the color yellow. Past work has shown that host leaf color is a key cue for habitat location for E. onukii. Before studying the effect of foliage shape, size, or texture on habitat localization, it is necessary to determine the visual acuity and effective viewing distance of E. onukii. In this study, a combination of 3D microscopy and X-ray microtomography showed that visual acuity did not significantly differ between females and males, but there were significant differences in the visual acuity and optical sensitivity among five regions of E. onukii’s compound eyes. The dorsal ommatidia had the highest visual acuity at 0.28 cycles per degree (cpd) but the lowest optical sensitivity (0.02 μm2sr), which indicated a trade-off between visual resolution and optical sensitivity for E. onukii. The visual acuity determined from the behavioral experiment was 0.14 cpd; E. onukii exhibited low-resolution vision and could only distinguish the units in a yellow/red pattern within 30 cm. Therefore, visual acuity contributes to the limited ability of E. onukii to distinguish the visual details of a distant target, which might be perceived as a lump of blurred color of intermediate brightness. Keywords: visual ability; Empoasca onukii; compound eye; structure; visual acuity 1. IntroductionVisual cues are important for insects’ ability to search for food, locate hosts, and navigate in flight. The quality of visual information acquired by insects is limited by the visual ability of compound eyes [1]. Empoasca onukii is a major pest of tea plants and has a significant preference for the color yellow [2]. In a previous study, we found that foliage color was an important habitat location cue for E. onukii [3]. Color is a basic parameter in the visual information of host leaves. Additionally, the shape and texture of leaves affect host localization of herbivorous insects [4]. The visual acuity of insect compound eyes is an important ability that determines whether insects can effectively use these parameters at a long distance. However, the visual acuity and effective viewing range of E. onukii have not yet been reported.The compound eyes of E. onukii are apposition eyes, which have tubular structures composed of the cornea, crystalline cones, and photoreceptor cells that transmit light to the rhabdom [5]. Multiple ommatidia cluster the identified images onto the retina, which is made up of several retinular cells [6]. In the insects’ visual system, visual acuity is the parameter that helps them resolve static spatial details. The better the acuity is, the greater the distance at which environmental structures can be used during localization and movement [7]. Moreover, visual acuity can be quantified with methods such as apposition eye analysis [8].The acuity index is closely related to compound eye structure. Two aspects of compound eye morphology fine-tune visual acuity in insects: interommatidial angle and separation angle [9]. The interommatidial angle, which is the separation angle of the photoreceptors, is determined by the ommatidia density in each region. The higher the density is in the same area, the higher the visual acuity [7]. Therefore, the smaller the interommatidial angle is, the better the visual acuity. In insects for which this information is known, acuity ranges from 0.01 cycles per degree (cpd) (bat fly, Trichobius frequens) to 2 cpd (dragonfly, Anax junius) [10]. Most insects have low visual acuity compared with human eyes, which have a visual acuity of 60 cpd; low acuity, to some extent, limits the ability to perceive details of the environment or specific patterns. The acceptance angle is the angular width of the region seen by each photoreceptor, the ommatidium, and is related to the ommatidium area. The smaller the ommatidium is, the more it is optically affected by diffraction [11]. However, for most diurnal insects with compound eyes, the upper limit of visual acuity can be estimated by the interommatidial angle [9]. It should be noted that, without understanding the mechanism of visual input after it reaches the visual nerve, the interommatidial and acceptance angles may only indicate physical limitations of the compound eye structure. A recent study showed that some insects possess muscles that can move the retina the distance of a few ommatidia [12]. Therefore, combining visual analysis with behavioral experiments may reveal the responsiveness of insect vision in specific environments [13].Empoasca onukii is an insect that undergoes incomplete metamorphosis. During the progression from nymph to adult, its range of activity increasingly expands, and the shape of its compound eyes also changes from spherical to kidney shaped; this indicates that its visual acuity is constantly changing and may differ in different regions of the compound eye. The measure of visual acuity, expressed as cpd, is the number of black and white stripe pairs that the photoreceptors can identify within an angle and is also represented by the angle of the narrowest black-and-white-stripe pair identified by the photoreceptor. Cycles per degree can be read in degrees (in which case it would be the reverse value); that is, the angular width of the narrowest black-and-white-stripe pair that can be discerned [8]. When the experimental conditions have been carefully selected, visual acuity values of insects measured by anatomical and behavioral methods are highly correlated [10]. Kirwan et al. [14] exploited object taxis to test the spatial resolution of Euperipatoides rowelli through a behavioral assay. Similarly, based on the taxis to yellow color, behavioral experiments can be designed to measure the visual acuity of E. onukii compound eyes.In this study, we measured the optical structural parameters of E. onukii compound eyes using histological techniques and obtained a theoretical value of their visual sensitivity. A piecewise sine stimulus of yellow and black grating was used as the target in behavioral experiments. Both the maximum distance at which E. onukii could recognize the stimulus and their behavioral visual acuity were analyzed based on the behavior of E. onukii. Finally, the visual recognition of a yellow/red pattern was simulated to assess the viewing distance of E. onukii. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. InsectsAdult E. onukii were collected from the tea garden of the Tea Research Institute at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Plants of the “Longjing 43” tea cultivar were hydroponically raised to rear insects in a 26 °C constant temperature insect-rearing room. Adults at 3 to 4 days after emergence were selected for experiments.In total, 8 males and 8 females were used for external 3D structure analysis, 3 females for internal 3D structure analysis, and 65 males and 107 females for behavioral experiments. 2.2. External 3D StructuresThe external 3D structure of compound eyes was measured using a digital microscope with a VH-Z100UR lens at 500×–700× (Keyence VHX-6000, Japan). The depth resolution of the 3D microscope was 0.45 µm. Because the single compound eye of E. onukii does not have uniform symmetry, the optical structural parameters of ommatidia in five different regions (posterior, ventral, central, anterior, and dorsal) were analyzed. First, adult E. onukii were each fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 30 min and then rinsed three times with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH = 7.0 for 15 min [15]. Before scanning, each sample was fixed with plasticine and placed on the microscope platform. After the orientation of the compound eye was adjusted, the five regions of the compound eye were scanned (Figure 1A). In total, 8 adult male and 8 adult female samples were analyzed.The Interommatidial angle and the ommatidium diameter were measured using the manufacturer’s software. Each hexagonal ommatidium was divided in three axial directions according to the midline of the opposite side, and the angle corresponding to the radius of curvature between the center points of several adjacent ommatidia was calculated from the side view. The angle was divided by the number of ommatidia (Figure 1B), and the mean value of the three axial angles was regarded as the mean interommatidial angle (Δϕ) [16]. The diameter of a single ommatidium was the mean distance between the longest diagonal (Dh) and the shortest edge (Dv) of the hexagonal ommatidium. Eight ommatidia were selected and measured to calculate the mean diameter (D) for each region.An independent-samples t-test was used to analyze the differences of Δϕ and D between females and males. After confirmation that there was no difference in Δϕ and D between the sexes, we pooled the data from both sexes and analyzed the differences in Δϕ and D among the five regions in compound eyes using one-way ANOVA and LSD comparison (SPSS 14.0, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). 2.3. Internal 3D StructuresBased on the above experimental results, the internal structure of three female E. onukii compound eyes was observed via a high-resolution X-ray microscopy imaging system (SKYSCAN1272, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). Adult E. onukii were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution overnight and rinsed three times with 0.1 M PBS at pH = 7.0 for 15 min each. For secondary fixation, the samples were treated with 1% osmic acid solution for 2 h and rinsed three times with 0.1 M PBS at pH = 7.0 for 15 min each. The samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol for 15 min at different concentrations (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 95%), treated with 100% ethanol for 20 min, and then stored in fresh 100% ethanol. The dehydrated samples were dried in a critical point dryer (HCP-2, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The dried samples were then scanned in the area of the head using the microscopy imaging system with a source voltage of 50 kV, source current of 55 µA, scanning image pixel size of 1.00 µm, and scanning time of 2 h; 750 images were reorganized by Avizo (2019.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham. MA, USA) [17]. The lengths (L) of 38 rhabdoms in 5 regions were measured using ImageJ (1.8.0, USA).The sensitivity (S) of an ommatidium was then determined with the following formula: S = (π/4)2 D2Δϕ2(kL/(2.3+kL)) where S has the units of μm2sr, D = diameter of the female ommatidia (μm), and L = the length of the photoreceptor (μm). The absorption coefficient, k = 0.0067 μm−1, was from Warrant and Nilsson [18].A one-way ANOVA was performed to analyze the differences in the lengths of rhabdoms of the five regions of female E. onukii compound eyes, and LSD comparison was used to determine differences in the data of each group. 2.4. Behavioral ExperimentsFor apposition eyes, visual resolution is structurally affected by the interommatidial angle, and the resolution determines the ability of the compound eyes to distinguish spatial details, which behaviorally manifests as the ability to identify light and dark gratings at a distance. Kirwan et al. [14] used white and black grating as the piecewise sine stimulus in their vision resolution study. Because of the taxis of E. onukii to yellow targets, yellow and black grating was designed as the piecewise sine stimulus in the behavioral experiment in this study.The experiment was performed in a dark chamber, with a cylindrical reaction area of 15 cm diameter and 5 cm height (Figure 2A). Below the reaction area was a luminosity plate of 815 µw/cm−2, which was derived from the light intensity during the peak period when E. onukii were active in clear weather. The background on the side of the reaction chamber was gray, and the target area was composed of yellow and black gratings of equal width. The piecewise sine stimulus consisted of a dark (negative) half-period sine flanked on each side by a light (positive) half-period sine of half the amplitude (Figure 2B,C). It was also a prerequisite for our experiments that the stimuli were isoluminant against the gray background if averaged across their whole width. Empoasca onukii adults will exhibit taxis toward high-brightness targets in their visual field; therefore, the purpose of isoluminance was to avoid adults choosing the target because of a difference in brightness and instead respond by recognizing the grating. Before each test, the reaction chamber was cleaned with ethanol and dried.Before each behavioral test, an individual E. onukii was dark-adapted for 10 min. The individual was then released at the farthest point from the grating (release point a, Figure 2D). Each E. onukii was allowed to randomly move until after reaching a specific point (such as identification point b, Figure 2B); a directional movement trend started until the yellow zone was contacted, which was considered the end of the test. The directional movement trend was usually completed rapidly, i.e., within 30 seconds. Each behavioral test was limited to 10 min. If the test exceeded 10 min, E. onukii were deemed to have no response to the target. Behavioral experiments were repeated for a total of 172 adults, and the blank control was repeated 15 times without stimulus.The movement trajectory of E. onukii was recorded by a high-speed camera (Revealer 2F01M, China). The recording started at starting point a and ended when E. onukii reached identification point b. The video analysis software Tracker (V6.0.8, USA) was used to calibrate the two-dimensional coordinate system, and the position of E. onukii during the search process was marked every 10 frames to determine the individual action trajectory. The angle between each point b and the width of the yellow area was measured (Figure 2B), which was regarded as the behavioral interommatidial angle of each E. onukii.The frequency distribution of the interommatidial angle values was constructed based on the results of the behavioral tests; then, a nonlinear regression (log normal, 3 parameter) was performed in SigmaPlot (V11.0, Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The peak value of the curve was regarded as the behavioral interommatidial angle (Δϕ’) at which E. onukii detected the stimulus grating. 2.5. Viewing Distance AssessmentThe AcuityView package in R (V4.2.0) was used to simulate E. onukii recognition of static images to assess effective viewing distance [19]. Three parameters, interommatidial angle (Δϕ’), target picture, and test distance, were entered in the R program to simulate E. onukii visual acuity at the test distances. The target picture was a color card (20 × 25 cm) with a checkerboard pattern of small red and yellow squares (5 × 5 cm), and this pattern has been reported to be attractive to E. onukii adults in the field [3]. The interommatidial angle was determined from behavioral experiments, where the target picture was a yellow/red patterned card with a 256 × 256 resolution, and the test distance was the length between the compound eye and the target. This approach provides a theoretical value of effective viewing distance of image details that are difficult to distinguish. 3. Results 3.1. Histological Visual AcuityHistological results showed no significant differences between sexes in the interommatidial angle (Δϕ) or ommatidia diameter (D) in different regions of adult E. onukii compound eyes (Table 1).Data from both sexes were pooled and analyzed. Among the five regions, the dorsal interommatidial angle was the smallest (Δϕ = 3.57° ± 0.13, visual acuity = 0.28 cpd) while the posterior ommatidia had the largest interommatidial angle (Δϕ = 8.52 ± 0.46°, visual acuity = 0.12 cpd); both significantly differed from those of the other three regions (F = 38.84, df = 4, p < 0.05; A). The ommatidia diameter in the dorsal region (D = 7.80 ± 0.30 µm) was the smallest and significantly differed from those in the posterior, ventral, and anterior regions (F = 6.43, df = 4, p < 0.05; Figure 3B). 3.2. Optical SensitivityRhabdoms in different regions are closely connected to the lens (Figure 4A–C). There were significant differences in the lengths of rhabdom of the five regions of female E. onukii compound eyes (F = 19.02, df = 4, p < 0.05; Figure 4D). The shortest rhabdom (L = 68.76 ± 0.76 µm) in the ventral region of the compound eyes had a small degree of bending, and the longest rhabdom was in the posterior region (L = 93.21 ± 4.28 µm).There were significant differences in the optical sensitivities (S) of rhabdoms among five regions of adult E. onukii compound eyes (F = 509.2, df = 4, p < 0.05; Figure 5), which indicated that the light absorption capacity differed among regions in the same compound eye. The sensitivity of the posterior region was the highest (S = 0.22 μm2sr), whereas that of the dorsal region was the lowest (S = 0.02 μm2sr). The phenomenon of high resolution and optical sensitivity in the dorsal region indicates that there is a structural and functional trade-off in the compound eye, and optical sensitivity is sacrificed to improve resolution in the dorsal region of E. onukii compound eyes. 3.3. Behavioral Visual AcuityIn the behavioral experiment without stimulus grating, E. onukii behavior trajectories were nondirectional, curving, and spiral (Figure 6A). In comparison, E. onukii performed random movement after release and then presented stable trends of moving toward a 5 × 5 cm wide piecewise sine stimulus. During the random process, E. onukii exhibited spiral flight, short distance jumping, and stable crawling behavior. After an individual detected the yellow stimulus, it moved toward the yellow area with a slightly curved trajectory (Figure 6B). Each E. onukii that exhibited no response remained in the same position and barely moved.Of the 172 total trending behaviors, 149 effective responses were recorded with the camera. Among the 149 effective responses to the stimulus, 79% of the interommatidial angles were between 6–8°, and the smallest angle reached 4.5°; these values were within the range of histological structure measurements. Figure 7 shows that the peak value of the curve in the frequency distribution diagram was the behavioral interommatidial angle (Δϕ’= 7.3°, R2 = 0.83), which had a reciprocal value of 0.14 cpd (behavioral visual acuity). 3.4. Viewing Distance AssessmentAccording to the behavioral visual acuity of 0.14 cpd, adult E. onukii could visually perceive blurred details of a 20 × 25 cm yellow/red pattern at 0–30 cm (Figure 8A–D). Beyond a distance of 30 cm, differences within the pattern could not be distinguished, and the pattern appeared as a single blurred color lump of intermediate brightness beyond 50 cm (Figure 8D, E). The sharpness of the pattern gradually decreased as the distance between the individual E. onukii and the target increased. 4. DiscussionThere is an acute zone in the dorsal region of adult E. onukii compound eyes that is characterized by large ommatidia diameters and small interommatidial angles [20]. The acute zone is related to behavioral habits, such as tracking mates or avoiding predation [13]. For example, the honeybee drone (Apis mellifera) uses its dorsal eye, which is the acute zone, to detect and approach the queen from behind and below during mating behavior [21]. However, visual cues are not important in the process of mate localization in E. onukii [22]; therefore, E. onukii might use dorsal ommatidia to observe the upper environment and detect potential predators.Because of the limited compound eye area of E. onukii, the same region cannot simultaneously have high resolution and optical sensitivity. Visual heterogeneity and the trade-off between resolution and sensitivity are necessary for behavioral requirements of small insects [23]. In general, larger insects have better visual acuity [17,24], but the “bright areas” and “love spots” formed by compound eye specialization can satisfy the trade-off of the distribution of visual resolution and optical sensitivity among different areas of the compound eye [25,26], which is a fine-tuned mechanism of compound eyes shaped by long-term evolution. In predatory insects such as Holcocephala fusca (Δϕ = 0.28°), which have a small body size, the nearly planar region of the anterior part of the compound eye provides high-resolution recognition of flying prey, and their vision in specialized regions is comparable to that of the dragonfly (Anax junius), which has compound eyes that are several times larger (Δϕ = 0.24°) [27,28]. As the compound eye grows at each molt, new ommatidia appear at the anterior region and the existing ommatidium move posteriorly [29], which may be the reason why the posterior ommatidia of E. onukii have long rhabdom and high optical sensitivity. The posterior ommatidia of E. onukii are more likely to combine with other regional ommatidia to provide light intensity differences in the whole field of view rather than discrimination, which facilitates adjustment of travel direction [12].The visual acuity of insects is closely related to their flight ability and range of movement. E. onukii adults are usually in a resting state, and leaf tenderness can be identified by foliage-reflected light intensity so that the most suitable living environment can be selected [6]. The single flight distance of E. onukii adults is very limited, and they mainly rely on spiral flight, curved crawling on the plane, and short hops through the tea plants. To date, no evidence of long-distance migration has been reported. Therefore, the visual ability of E. onukii compound eyes (Δϕ = 7.3°) can meet their survival needs. Similar to psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Aphalaridae) (Δϕ = 6.3°), the low-resolution vision of E. onukii limits their ability to perceive details and recognize hosts or conspecific species at long distances [15]. For most long-distance, fast-flying insects, such as bees, flies, and butterflies, the Δϕ range is between 1–3°, and they can see longer distances. Predatory invertebrates such as dragonflies, mantises, and spiders have a minimum Δϕ of less than 1°, and they can see smaller prey travelling at higher flight speeds [9].In our previous study, the yellow/red patterned sticky cards (20 × 25 cm) could be used to trap E. onukii adults in the field [3]. While the surface area of the yellow in the bicolor traps was half that of the yellow sticky cards, similar numbers of trap-collected E. onukii were obtained in the field, likely because of their strong attraction to yellow. At a distance beyond 30 cm, sticky cards with 5 × 5 cm yellow and red squares would appear yellow (Figure 8), they would likely appear less bright and merge into yellow with intermediate brightness, and thus are similarly attractive to the insects [30]. However, the reason why bicolor sticky and yellow sticky cards showed similar trapping effects in the field needs further research, especially with regard to the effective attraction range of the two types of sticky cards and the flight ability of E. onukii. 5. ConclusionsThere is an acute zone in the compound eyes of adult E. onukii. To obtain visual resolution, E. onukii sacrifices some optical sensitivity in the dorsal ommatidia. The structural trade-off of the compound eye ensures that E. onukii has a low-resolution vision of approximately 0.14 cpd; in other words, this is only sufficient to recognize a pattern (20 × 25 cm) of yellow and red square units (5 × 5 cm) within 30 cm. Beyond 30 cm, E. onukii might perceive the bicolor patterns as yellow of intermediate brightness. Author ContributionsConceptualization, C.T., Z.C. and L.B.; Methodology, C.T.; Software, Z.L. (Zongxiu Luo), Z.L. (Zhaoqun Li) and C.X.; Formal analysis, Z.L. (Zongxiu Luo), Z.L. (Zhaoqun Li) and Z.C.; Investigation, X.C.; Resources, X.C., Z.C. and L.B.; Data curation, Z.L. (Zhaoqun Li) and L.B.; Writing—original draft, C.T. and C.X.; Writing—review and editing, C.T. and L.B.; Visualization, Z.L. (Zongxiu Luo), Z.L. (Zhaoqun Li) and C.X.; Supervision, Z.L. (Zongxiu Luo) and L.B.; Project administration, X.C., Z.C. and L.B.; Funding acquisition, C.X. and L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.FundingThis research was funded by the Youth Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (no. Y2022QC25, China), the Division of Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province (LQ17C040002, China), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31702052, China), and the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2018QNRC001).Data Availability StatementThe data presented in this study are openly available in [FigShare] at [10.6084/m9.figshare.22578250].AcknowledgmentsWe thank Qing Yao from Zhejiang Sci-Tech University for providing the piecewise sine stimulus-generating software.Conflicts of InterestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.ReferencesLand, M.F.; Nilsson, D.E. Animal Eyes; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]Meng, Z.N.; Bian, L.; Luo, Z.X.; Li, Z.Q.; Xin, Z.J.; Cai, X.M. Taxonomic Revision and Analysis of the Green Tea Leafhopper Species in China’s Main Tea Production Area. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2018, 55, 514–526. [Google Scholar]Bian, L.; Cai, X.M.; Luo, Z.X.; Li, Z.Q.; Chen, Z.M. Sticky Card for Empoasca Onukii with Bicolor Patterns Captures Less Beneficial Arthropods in Tea Gardens. Crop Prot. 2021, 149, 105761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Prokopy, R.J.; Owens, E.D. Visual Detection of Plants by Herbivorous Insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1983, 28, 337–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Stavenga, D.G. Angular and Spectral Sensitivity of Fly Photoreceptors. I. Integrated Facet Lens and Rhabdomere Optics. J. Comp. Physiol. a-Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 2003, 189, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]Bian, L.; XCai, M.; Luo, Z.X.; Li, Z.Q.; Chen, Z.M. Foliage Intensity Is an Important Cue of Habitat Location Empoasca Onukii. Insects 2020, 11, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]Stavenga, D.G. Visual Acuity of Fly Photoreceptors in Natural Conditions—Dependence on Uv Sensitizing Pigment and Light-Controlling Pupil. J. Exp. Biol. 2004, 207, 1703–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Caves, E.M.; Brandley, N.C.; Johnsen, S. Visual Acuity and the Evolution of Signals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2018, 33, 358–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Cronin, T.W.; Johnsen, S.; Marshall, N.J.; Warrant, E.J. Visual Ecology; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]Land, M.F. Visual Acuity in Insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1997, 42, 147–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Berry, R.P.; Stange, G.; Warrant, E.J. Form Vision in the Insect Dorsal Ocelli: An Anatomical and Optical Analysis of the Dragonfly Median Ocellus. Vis. Res. 2007, 47, 1394–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Fenk, L.M.; Avritzer, S.C.; Weisman, J.; Nair, A.; Randt, L.D.; Mohren, T.L.; Siwanowicz, I.; Maimon, G. Muscles That Move the Retina Augment Compound Eye Vision in Drosophila. Nature 2022, 612, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Dyer, A.G.; Paulk, A.C.; Reser, D.H. Colour Processing in Complex Environments: Insights from the Visual System of Bees. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 278, 952–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]Kirwan, J.D.; Graf, J.; Smolka, J.; Mayer, G.; Henze, M.J.; Nilsson, D.E. Low-Resolution Vision in a Velvet Worm (Onychophora). J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 221, jeb175802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Farnier, K.; Dyer, A.G.; Taylor, G.S.; Peters, R.A.; Steinbauer, M.J. Visual Acuity Trade-Offs and Microhabitat-Driven Adaptation of Searching Behaviour in Psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Aphalaridae). J. Exp. Biol. 2015, 218, 1564–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Land, M.F. The Resolution of Insect Compound Eyes. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 1997, 45, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Taylor, G.J.; Tichit, P.; Schmidt, M.D.; Bodey, A.J.; Rau, C.; Baird, E. Bumblebee Visual Allometry Results in Locally Improved Resolution and Globally Improved Sensitivity. eLife 2019, 8, e40613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Warrant, E.J.; Nilsson, D.E. Absorption of White Light in Photoreceptors. Vis. Res. 1998, 38, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Caves, E.M.; Johnsen, S. Acuityview: An R Package for Portraying the Effects of Visual Acuity on Scenes Observed by an Animal. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2018, 9, 793–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Horridge, G.A. The Separation of Visual Axes in Apposition Compound Eyes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 1978, 285, 1–59. [Google Scholar]Menzel, J.G.; Wunderer, H.; Stavenga, D.G. Functional Morphology of the Divided Compound Eye of the Honeybee Drone (Apis Mellifera). Tissue Cell 1991, 23, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Zhang, H.N.; Bian, L.; Cai, X.M.; Yao, Q.; Fu, N.X.; Shan, Y.; Chen, Z.M. Vibrational Signals Are Species-Specific and Sex-Specific for Sexual Communication in the Tea Leafhopper, Empoasca Onukii. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2023, 171, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Stockl, A.; Smolka, J.; O’Carroll, D.; Warrant, E. Resolving the Trade-Off between Visual Sensitivity and Spatial Acuity-Lessons from Hawkmoths. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2017, 57, 1093–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]Stavenga, D.G.; Kinoshita, M.; Yang, E.C.; Arikawa, K. Retinal Regionalization and Heterogeneity of Butterfly Eyes. Naturwissenschaften 2001, 88, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Perry, M.W.; Desplan, C. Love Spots. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, R484–R485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Straw, A.D.; Warrant, E.J.; O’Carroll, D.C. A ‘Bright Zone’ in Male Hoverfly (Eristalis Tenax) Eyes and Associated Faster Motion Detection and Increased Contrast Sensitivity. J. Exp. Biol. 2006, 209, 4339–4354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Wardill, T.J.; Fabian, S.T.; Pettigrew, A.C.; Stavenga, D.G.; Nordstrom, K.; Gonzalez-Bellido, P.T. A Novel Interception Strategy in a Miniature Robber Fly with Extreme Visual Acuity. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, 854–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]Meece, M.; Rathore, S.; Buschbeck, E.K. Stark Trade-Offs and Elegant Solutions in Arthropod Visual Systems. J. Exp. Biol. 2021, 224, jeb215541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Herzog, E.D.; Barlow, R.B. The Limulus-Eye View of the World. Vis. Neurosci. 1992, 9, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]de Ibarra, N.H.; Langridge, K.V.; Vorobyev, M. More Than Colour Attraction: Behavioural Functions of Flower Patterns. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2015, 12, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Insects 14 00370 g001 550

Figure 1. Interommatidial angle (Δϕ) and ommatidia diameter (D) measurements of the compound eye. (A) The compound eye is divided into five regions: posterior, ventral, central, anterior, and dorsal. (B) Side view of the adjacent ommatidia interommatidial angle and diameter. The hexagonal ommatidia with six adjacent ommatidia were used to measure the radius of curvature, and the corresponding angle (Δϕ) was calculated between two ommatidia. The diameter of a single ommatidium was the mean distance between the longest diagonal (Dh) and the shortest edge (Dv) of the hexagonal ommatidium. The ommatidia diameter (D) was the mean of eight ommatidia in each region. Figure 1. Interommatidial angle (Δϕ) and ommatidia diameter (D) measurements of the compound eye. (A) The compound eye is divided into five regions: posterior, ventral, central, anterior, and dorsal. (B) Side view of the adjacent ommatidia interommatidial angle and diameter. The hexagonal ommatidia with six adjacent ommatidia were used to measure the radius of curvature, and the corresponding angle (Δϕ) was calculated between two ommatidia. The diameter of a single ommatidium was the mean distance between the longest diagonal (Dh) and the shortest edge (Dv) of the hexagonal ommatidium. The ommatidia diameter (D) was the mean of eight ommatidia in each region. Insects 14 00370 g001

Figure 2. Diagrammatic drawing of the behavioral experiment setup. (A) Side view of the experimental setup, with the high-speed camera above. In the middle is the behavioral reaction setup (15 cm diameter, 5 cm height). A yellow–black grating with 5 × 5 cm patches was placed on the side wall, and the overall brightness of the grating was the same as that of the gray background on the side wall. Below is the luminescent background plate with a light intensity of 815 µw/cm−2. (B,C) The yellow–black grating and its brightness correspond to the piecewise sine stimulus. (D) Top view of the behavioral experiment setup. Empoasca onukii were released at point a and conducted spontaneous search behavior to point b; during this time, if E. onukii exhibited a recognition response to the yellow–black grating, the angle Δϕ between the individual and the target grating was measured. Figure 2. Diagrammatic drawing of the behavioral experiment setup. (A) Side view of the experimental setup, with the high-speed camera above. In the middle is the behavioral reaction setup (15 cm diameter, 5 cm height). A yellow–black grating with 5 × 5 cm patches was placed on the side wall, and the overall brightness of the grating was the same as that of the gray background on the side wall. Below is the luminescent background plate with a light intensity of 815 µw/cm−2. (B,C) The yellow–black grating and its brightness correspond to the piecewise sine stimulus. (D) Top view of the behavioral experiment setup. Empoasca onukii were released at point a and conducted spontaneous search behavior to point b; during this time, if E. onukii exhibited a recognition response to the yellow–black grating, the angle Δϕ between the individual and the target grating was measured. Insects 14 00370 g002

Figure 3. Interommatidial angle (Δϕ) and ommatidia diameter (D) of Empoasca onukii compound eyes (mean ± SE). (A) Box plot of Δϕ in five different regions. (B) Ommatidia diameter distribution in different regions of the same compound eye; eight ommatidia were measured in each region. The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA). Figure 3. Interommatidial angle (Δϕ) and ommatidia diameter (D) of Empoasca onukii compound eyes (mean ± SE). (A) Box plot of Δϕ in five different regions. (B) Ommatidia diameter distribution in different regions of the same compound eye; eight ommatidia were measured in each region. The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA). Insects 14 00370 g003

Figure 4. Internal structure and the lengths of rhabdom in five regions of the female compound eye (mean ± SE). (A) From top to bottom: dorsal, central, and ventral. (B) From left to right: ventral, central, and dorsal. (C) From top to bottom: anterior, central, and posterior. (D) Rhabdom lengths in five different regions. The marked area in A–C is the rhabdom. The different lowercase letters in D indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA). Figure 4. Internal structure and the lengths of rhabdom in five regions of the female compound eye (mean ± SE). (A) From top to bottom: dorsal, central, and ventral. (B) From left to right: ventral, central, and dorsal. (C) From top to bottom: anterior, central, and posterior. (D) Rhabdom lengths in five different regions. The marked area in A–C is the rhabdom. The different lowercase letters in D indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA). Insects 14 00370 g004

Figure 5. The optical sensitivity (S) in the posterior, ventral, anterior, central, and dorsal regions of female Empoasca onukii compound eyes (mean ± SE). The S value was calculated from Equation (1). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA). Figure 5. The optical sensitivity (S) in the posterior, ventral, anterior, central, and dorsal regions of female Empoasca onukii compound eyes (mean ± SE). The S value was calculated from Equation (1). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA). Insects 14 00370 g005

Figure 6. Movement behavior trajectories of Empoasca onukii in behavioral experiments. (A) Blank control, E. onukii search trajectories in the absence of stimulus and (B) E. onukii search trajectories in the presence of stimulus. Figure 6. Movement behavior trajectories of Empoasca onukii in behavioral experiments. (A) Blank control, E. onukii search trajectories in the absence of stimulus and (B) E. onukii search trajectories in the presence of stimulus. Insects 14 00370 g006

Figure 7. Frequency distribution diagram of interommatidial angles from the behavioral experiment. The x-axis is the frequency distribution of interommatidial angles with the same interval. The fitting curve (log normal, 3 parameter) was obtained using SigmaPlot (V11.0). Figure 7. Frequency distribution diagram of interommatidial angles from the behavioral experiment. The x-axis is the frequency distribution of interommatidial angles with the same interval. The fitting curve (log normal, 3 parameter) was obtained using SigmaPlot (V11.0). Insects 14 00370 g007

Figure 8. Simulations of the viewing distance of Empoasca onukii. (A) Target yellow/red pattern with 256 × 256 resolution. (B–H) Visual simulations of E. onukii viewing a 20 × 25 cm yellow/red pattern at different distances with a visual acuity of 0.14 cpd was conducted using the AcuityView package in R (V4.2.0). Figure 8. Simulations of the viewing distance of Empoasca onukii. (A) Target yellow/red pattern with 256 × 256 resolution. (B–H) Visual simulations of E. onukii viewing a 20 × 25 cm yellow/red pattern at different distances with a visual acuity of 0.14 cpd was conducted using the AcuityView package in R (V4.2.0). Insects 14 00370 g008

Table 1. Interommatidial angle (Δϕ) and ommatidia diameter (D) of male and female Empoasca onukii compound eyes (mean ± SE). Table 1. Interommatidial angle (Δϕ) and ommatidia diameter (D) of male and female Empoasca onukii compound eyes (mean ± SE). DorsalVentralPosteriorAnteriorCenterInterommatidial angle (Δϕ)Female3.46 ± 0.085.83 ± 0.128.83 ± 0.784.72 ± 0.495.07 ± 0.42Male3.68 ± 0.265.85 ± 0.448.21 ± 0.594.58 ± 0.434.93 ± 0.53t0.800.070.630.210.21p0.470.990.560.840.84Ommatidia diameter (D)Female7.97 ± 0.198.82 ± 0.218.79 ± 0.548.88 ± 0.198.11 ± 0.22Male7.64 ± 0.338.98 ± 0.198.99 ± 0.599.02 ± 0.138.30 ± 0.11t0.890.590.250.620.76p0.430.590.810.570.49 Significant differences between males and females were determined with an independent-samples t-test (p < 0.05). Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Share and Cite MDPI and ACS Style

Tan, C.; Cai, X.; Luo, Z.; Li, Z.; Xiu, C.; Chen, Z.; Bian, L. Visual acuity of Empoasca onukii (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae). Insects 2023, 14, 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040370

AMA Style

Tan C, Cai X, Luo Z, Li Z, Xiu C, Chen Z, Bian L. Visual acuity of Empoasca onukii (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae). Insects. 2023; 14(4):370. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040370

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tan, Chang, Xiaoming Cai, Zongxiu Luo, Zhaoqun Li, Chunli Xiu, Zongmao Chen, and Lei Bian. 2023. "Visual acuity of Empoasca onukii (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae)" Insects 14, no. 4: 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040370

Find Other Styles Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here. Article Metrics No No Article Access Statistics For more information on the journal statistics, click here. Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view. Zoom | Orient | As Lines | As Sticks | As Cartoon | As Surface | Previous Scene | Next Scene Cite Export citation file: BibTeX | EndNote | RIS MDPI and ACS Style

Tan, C.; Cai, X.; Luo, Z.; Li, Z.; Xiu, C.; Chen, Z.; Bian, L. Visual acuity of Empoasca onukii (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae). Insects 2023, 14, 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040370

AMA Style

Tan C, Cai X, Luo Z, Li Z, Xiu C, Chen Z, Bian L. Visual acuity of Empoasca onukii (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae). Insects. 2023; 14(4):370. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040370

Chicago/Turabian Style

Find Other Styles Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here. clear Insects, EISSN 2075-4450, Published by MDPI RSS Content Alert Further Information Article Processing Charges Pay an Invoice Open Access Policy Contact MDPI Jobs at MDPI Guidelines For Authors For Reviewers For Editors For Librarians For Publishers For Societies For Conference Organizers MDPI Initiatives Sciforum MDPI Books Preprints.org Scilit SciProfiles Encyclopedia JAMS Proceedings Series Follow MDPI LinkedIn Facebook Twitter

© 1996-2023 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated Disclaimer Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience. Read more about our cookies here. Accept We have just recently launched a new version of our website. Help us to further improve by taking part in this short 5 minute survey here. here. Never show this again Share Link Copy clear Share https://www.mdpi.com/2238052 clear Back to TopTop

【本文地址】

公司简介

联系我们